|
|
|
Sexy texts: Teenage prank or a serious problem?
Published Saturday, March 14, 2009 in
share this post

My brother sent me an email a couple of weeks ago with a link to a news story about a teenager in a nearby county who is being prosecuted in juvenile court for sending nude photos of herself to her boyfriend over her cell phone. When they broke up, the boy then forward the pics to his buddies. The newspaper doesn’t say if this was retaliation for being dumped or justification for doing the dumping. Either way, the boy is a creep.
But the story doesn’t say if the boy is in trouble; only that the girl is being held accountable for distribution of illegal child pornography. In case you aren’t aware, using a cell phone to distribute nude photos of minors is against the law, even if you’re the one in the photo.
The practice of sending dirty pics is known as “sexting.” My brother thinks it reflects bad judgment and immaturity on the part of teens and should be treated as a disciplinary problem, not a criminal one that requires law enforcement and public funds for prosecution. He raises the point that “sexting” crimes are handled inconsistently from county to county (there now being so many that we can compare their disposition), and that it’s unfair for this act of poor judgment to be treated like a foolish prank in one jurisdiction and a serious crime in another.
But make no mistake, “sexting” is serious. It’s not a prank – even if it originates from a bold and brazen teen sending illicit photos of herself to a boyfriend. I would argue that there isn’t a teen in America who doesn’t know that this practice is at least inappropriate, even if she doesn’t appreciate the criminal nature of her actions. (I say she because, sadly, girls are the ones more often originating the material, which then is widely disseminated).
In fact, being arrested and prosecuted for distribution of child porn might be the best outcome. What’s worse is the case of Jessica Logan, an Ohio teen whose nasty self-portrait circulated from her ex-boyfriend’s phone to dozens of phones of fellow schoolmates – girls, actually. She was then labeled by other girls (words that rhyme with gore and glut) and brutally harassed. She didn’t confide in her parents but instead sank into a deep depression, culminating in her suicide. Her grieving mom now is making the media rounds to inform parents of the dangers of “sexting” and warn them to keep an eye out for the symptoms of depression.
Perhaps being caught and brought into the legal system may have helped Jessica get the counseling she obviously needed. I would argue anyone who sends such a text message in the first place is screaming for attention and support.
Let me say here that the system needs to hold the receivers of such texts accountable as well, especially if they forward the photos to others. It’s not OK to exploit someone simply because she exploited herself to begin with. Perhaps if Jessica’s photos had been brought to the attention of school officials, the harassment and humiliation could have been brought under control, even if the girl had had to suffer some consequences for her actions.
But then again, probably not. Jessica is an example of how dangerous it is to get caught up in a “prank” that crushes a teenager’s spirit, corrupts her innocence and forever changes her reputation and her self-image.
“Sexting” a big deal. We ought not minimize it.
| Comments |
By
Jennifer @
Sunday, March 15, 2009 9:52 PM
|
|
I am so disheartened that this goes on. However, I do question how needy these girls are. Maybe they're imitating big girls like "Sex in the City", "Desparate Housewives" and the girls in dad's magazines. We've come a long way baby? I don't think so.
|
|
|
By
JohnH @
Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:21 AM
|
I don't understand how putting a teenage girl on a sex offender's registry for sending pictures of herself will help her. I'm sure that this sort of thing has been going on since the invention of the camera, it's only now that the laws created to protect children from exploitation have been grotesquely twisted and without any hint of (un)common sense, used to destroy the life of one of these they are meant to protect. Using the justice system against children in this manner is unconscionable, immoral and should not be tolerated.
|
|
|
By
JohnH @
Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:26 AM
|
It is a problem that must be addressed, but using the justice system to deal with it is like the proverbial sledge hammer to kill a fly. You MIGHT get the fly, but it is without a doubt that there will be collateral damage.
|
|
|
By
Jack @
Wednesday, April 15, 2009 11:08 AM
|
|
The issue of "sexting" could be solved two ways: the phone manufacturers should offer simpler (and cheaper) models that don't have cameras at all. After all, phones didn't used to have them. Parents could then trade DOWN to these models for their kids. Or second, parents could simply take and destroy the lens on their kids' cameras--scratch it badly, hit it with a small punch, whatever. No pix, no problems.
|
|
|
By
Fish @
Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:19 PM
|
|
Very serious subject. We just had a law professor from Cooley Law School here to talk about the problems associated with this. Not like the good ole days when we used to send notes up the aisle!
|
|
|
By
Muneer @
Sunday, August 09, 2009 11:41 AM
|
|
Ofcourse it is a good article and specially mobile sets has increased the frequency of sexy text for teenage hence making them more ugly minded. I also have some useful tips at http://sites.google.com/site/asulikenow
|
|
|
By
ffa @
Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:38 PM
|
|
WOW! This is dumb. There are way bigger issues in the world going on today. We are paying taxes for this girl who is in jail for sending pictures??? THIS IS BULLSHIT
|
|
|
Click here to post a comment
|
|